The rise of the flexible identity

In their simplest form, corporate identities exist to make organisations recognisable – through words, pictures and sound. Ideally they also help you stand out, and sometimes they’re distinctive enough to be protected in law.

For years, that recognisability was delivered through something very simple: a static logo, applied in a tightly controlled way, again and again.

But like everything else in branding and communications, identity is changing. Or more accurately, evolving – alongside shifting cultures, new technology and very different expectations from the people on the receiving end. 

From static stamps to living systems

When many of us started out, the rules were clear.

You had one logo, in a handful of sizes. Brand managers were guardians of consistency and repetition. Message, tone and visuals were briefed to be the same, whoever you were talking to and wherever it appeared.

The brief to designers was equally simple:

“Give us something clear, coherent and repeatable – across everything.”

Hence the era of the logo as a stamp – always in the same place, looking the same way. Dependable, but not exactly responsive.

Today that world has gone. Communication is more fluid, more fragmented and far less controllable. Identities have to work across multiple platforms, devices, languages and time zones. They need to feel at home on a business card, a website header, an app icon and a social post.

Trying to lock every expression of a brand into one fixed configuration now feels, at best, unrealistic – and at worst, counter-productive.

Why flexibility started to matter

Modern identities have to build a relationship, not just recognition.

They’re part of how an organisation:

• provokes conversation
• invites feedback
• responds to mood and context
• stays relevant in a fast-moving world

As Marina Willer has put it, design isn’t decoration; it has to reflect the behaviour of its users, and today’s users expect to have a voice. 

When experience falls short, people can and will say so – frequently, publicly and with ease. In that environment, identity becomes less about stamping the logo on everything, and more about maintaining a familiar presence that can flex as situations and audiences change.

That’s where flexible identities come in: systems designed with enough structure to be recognisable, and enough range to adapt.

Early examples: flexibility as a feature, not a problem

This isn’t a brand-new idea. You can trace flexible identity back decades.

• In 1959, Karl Gerstner’s identity for Boîte à musique, a record shop in Basel, used a modular system where type and shapes reconfigured across applications. The point wasn’t randomness; it was to express a personality, not just a logo. 
• In 1981, MTV launched with a logo that was intentionally a blank canvas. The core “M” and “TV” stayed, but style, colour and texture changed constantly to mirror youth culture. The identity took on the attitude of its audience.
• From 1998 onwards, Google Doodles turned minor logo tweaks into a regular feature – marking events, people and cultural moments. The wordmark stays recognisable; the play around it keeps the brand feeling current and human.

Since then we’ve seen many more explicit flexible systems: the Whitney Museum’s responsive “W”, North’s identity for the Barbican, the City of Melbourne mark, Pentagram’s work for MIT Media Lab and others. Different executions, same underlying move: identity as a system, not a single image. 

From control to parameters

So what does this mean for the way we design and manage identities?

It doesn’t mean guidelines disappear. It means their role changes.

Instead of trying to predict and prescribe every possible use (an impossible task), the job becomes to:

• define what must stay familiar – core shapes, wordmarks, colours, tone
• set clear parameters for variation – grids, motion principles, illustration styles, typographic ranges
• show how the system behaves across real-world applications – not just pristine templates

The question shifts from “How do we control everything?” to “How do we design the boundaries so that whatever happens within them still feels like us?”

Digital and social channels are a big driver here. They demand identities that can contract and expand, animate, respond and recombine – while still feeling coherent.

Flexible doesn’t mean chaotic

There’s a risk, of course, that “flexibility” is taken as licence for anything goes.

The best flexible identities avoid that by remembering a few fundamentals:

• Recognisability is non-negotiable. However much you flex, people still need to know it’s you.
• Personality comes first. Start with the attitude you want to convey, then design a system that can express it in different contexts.
• Change has a purpose. Things look different for a reason – audience, platform, content – not just for novelty.
• Principles beat rules. A handful of clear principles (“always feel optimistic and human”, “never look corporate or cold”) will often travel further than 200 pages of micro-rules.

Gerstner’s point still stands: the goal is to communicate an identity in the human sense – character, voice, attitude – not just a fixed graphic device.

Where this leaves us

Not every organisation needs a highly expressive, ever-changing identity. Some sectors and audiences benefit from restraint and stability.

But every identity now needs to consider flexibility. Contexts change too fast, and channels are too varied, for a single static treatment to cope on its own.

The task isn’t to abandon consistency. It’s to redefine it:

• from “always the same”
• to “always recognisably us, even when we look and move differently”.

At Sable&Hawkes we see flexible identity not as a break from traditional principles, but as an evolution of them. Clarity, recognisability and purpose still matter. The difference is that now, identities have to achieve those things in motion, not just on the guidelines page.

If you’re wondering whether your current identity has enough flexibility built in – or you’re thinking about how to design one that does – we’d be very happy to talk.

Sable&Hawkes
Branding | Design | Digital | Content | Social
Do good work. Be good people.